From: Date: August 4 2004 9:31pm
Subject: Re: timestamps
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/java/7739
Message-Id: <4111398A.40204@predict.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

yes, they are innodb tables. i populated the new time_zone tables using 
the system time zone files as per the manual recommendations, but, alas, 
no change.

are you saying that its all messed up? dumping and reloading really 
isn't the greatest option  :(

jeff
Mark Matthews wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jeff Mathis wrote:
> | hello,
> |
> | sorry if this is a know issue. we just upgraded our server from 4.0.4 to
> | 4.1.3, and are now using the 3.1.3 CJ release.
> |
> | i noticed that after the upgrade, all our timestamp columns are wrong!
> |
> | | 2036-07-09 05:45:55 |
> | | 2036-07-15 05:42:42 |
> | | 2036-07-15 05:42:45 |
> | | 2036-07-15 05:42:45 |
> | | 2036-07-16 05:42:35 |
> |
> | everything is wrong; the year, month and day. what happened? anyone else
> | seen this?
> |
> | jeff
> |
> 
> Jeff...Are these InnoDB tables? (If so, unfortunately it looks like
> you'll have to dump and re-load, from what I hear).
> 
>     -Mark
> 
> - --
> Mr. Mark Matthews
> MySQL AB, Software Development Manager, J2EE and Windows Platforms
> Office: +1 708 332 0507
> www.mysql.com
> 
> MySQL Guide to Lower TCO
> http://www.mysql.com/it-resources/white-papers/tco.php
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBETGItvXNTca6JD8RArFgAKCBlujs3RqozStFLCn2Fkyf7AuzFwCgkHA6
> 6bshoNnrkKIjVOgIrjn8fHw=
> =5HFm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 


-- 
Jeff Mathis, Ph.D.			505-955-1434
Prediction Company			jmathis@stripped
525 Camino de los Marquez, Ste 6	http://www.predict.com
Santa Fe, NM 87505