Hi.
On Thu 2002-11-21 at 02:25:37 +0200, monty@stripped wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> >>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Pflugmann
> <benjamin-mysql@stripped> writes:
> <cut>
>
> >> +++ 1.15/mysys/mf_keycache.c Mon Nov 18 14:59:43 2002
> >> @@ -548,13 +548,14 @@
> >> count++;
> >> }
> >> /* Only allocate a new buffer if its bigger than the one we have */
> >> - if (count <= FLUSH_CACHE ||
> >> - !(cache=(SEC_LINK**) my_malloc(sizeof(SEC_LINK*)*count,MYF(0))))
> >> + if (count > FLUSH_CACHE)
> >> {
> >> - cache=cache_buff; /* Fall back to safe buffer */
> >> - count=FLUSH_CACHE;
> >> + if (!(cache=(SEC_LINK**) my_malloc(sizeof(SEC_LINK*)*count,MYF(0))))
> >> + {
> >> + cache=cache_buff; /* Fall back to safe buffer */
> >> + count=FLUSH_CACHE;
> >> + }
> >> }
> >> - end=cache+count;
> >> }
>
> Benjamin> Sorry, if I am ignorant here, but before the change, it was assured,
> Benjamin> that
>
> Benjamin> count <= FLASH_CACHE
>
> Benjamin> after this code part.
As it is written, it is nonsense of course. I am not able to reproduce
any more what I wanted to say originally.
Your explanation makes completely sense. I must have imagined another
case, which is not there. I am not sure what I was smoking. I am sorry
that I wasted your time.
Bye,
Benjamin.
--
benjamin-mysql@stripped
