On Wednesday 21 February 2001 14:16, Hroi Sigurdsson wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:30:16PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
>> Ok. The proxy feature should not be very hard to do, actually, and it will
>> not affect the stability of 3.23, so if Monty is not opposed, I'll code it
>> shortly. Monty does want new code to go to 4.0 as a rule, but sometimes
>> can talk him into putting it in 3.23. So let's see what he says... If he
>> yes now, I could probably have it ready before 3.23.34 is out.
>Wow! :-) We had intended to hack this ourselves. We only needed some
Monty would have to approve it, of course. In my opinion, this can easily go
into 3.23 - let's see what the boss says.
>> I am thinking of the following options in my.cnf:
yes, that's what I meant.
>> if proxy is set, proxy both read and writes, if read-proxy is set, proxy
>> reads, if write-proxy set proxy writes.
>That looks very reasonable. Thanks.
>Do you have anonymous cvs access or any other means of tracking code
>changes? I couldn't find it on the website.
MySQL Development Team
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Sasha Pachev <sasha@stripped>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, http://www.mysql.com/
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Provo, Utah, USA