On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:30:16PM -0700, Sasha Pachev wrote:
> Ok. The proxy feature should not be very hard to do, actually, and it will
> not affect the stability of 3.23, so if Monty is not opposed, I'll code it up
> shortly. Monty does want new code to go to 4.0 as a rule, but sometimes you
> can talk him into putting it in 3.23. So let's see what he says... If he said
> yes now, I could probably have it ready before 3.23.34 is out.
Wow! :-) We had intended to hack this ourselves. We only needed some
guidance..
> I am thinking of the following options in my.cnf:
>
> proxy-host
> proxy-user
> proxy-password
> read-proxy-host
> read-proxy-user
> read-proxy-password
> write-proxy-host
> write-proxy-user
> write-proxy-host
write-proxy-password?
> if proxy is set, proxy both read and writes, if read-proxy is set, proxy
> reads, if write-proxy set proxy writes.
That looks very reasonable. Thanks.
Do you have anonymous cvs access or any other means of tracking code
changes? I couldn't find it on the website.
--
Hroi Sigurdsson hroi@stripped
Netgroup A/S http://www.netgroup.dk
