| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Hiromichi Watari | Date: | November 22 2011 2:34pm |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi Steve, Mark, Stewart and Rick Thank you for your feedback. From what you are saying, is it fair to say that InnoDB serializes table access among competing requests (perhaps to simplify design to support transactions) while MyISAM allow concurrent access ? My experiment results seem to be confirming the assumptions. Thank you all for your help. Hiromichi
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Concurrent table access from InnoDB | hwatari | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | MySQL) | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | MySQL) | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Mark Leith | 21 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Stewart Smith | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 23 Nov |
| • RE: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Steve Hardy | 21 Nov |
