| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Rick James | Date: | November 18 2011 9:29pm |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Is this what keeps there from being parallelism in PARTITIONed tables? On 11/18/11 1:26 PM, Shawn Green (MySQL) wrote: > Hello Hiromichi, > > On 11/17/2011 20:42, hwatari@stripped wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> Is it possible for a client connection thread to access 2 tables concurrently > from InnoDB, say using a slave thread ? Or is access limited to one table at a time per > client connection thread ? >> Thanks, >> Hiromichi >> > Each connection (client session) is only allowed to have one active > command. That one command may affect multiple tables but there can only > be one active command or its corresponding results on the connection at > any one time. > > if one client needs to process the results of two or more commands in > parallel, they need to open separate connections and execute those > commands independently through each connection. -- Rick James - MySQL Geek
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Concurrent table access from InnoDB | hwatari | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | MySQL) | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | MySQL) | 18 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 19 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Mark Leith | 21 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Stewart Smith | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Rick James | 22 Nov |
| • Re: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Hiromichi Watari | 23 Nov |
| • RE: Concurrent table access from InnoDB | Steve Hardy | 21 Nov |
