Re: [STYLE] use true/false in C++, not TRUE/FALSE

[Michael Widenius]

Hi!

>>>>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@stripped> writes:

MARK> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Davi Arnaut <davi.arnaut@stripped>
> wrote:
>> 
>> I haven't keep up with the thread, but I think the my_bool for C code is a
>> bit of silliness. We should just stick to int where applicable and be done
>> with it.

MARK> I hope the code moves in that direction. I understand using 0 for
MARK> success and != 0 for error. I get confused when TRUE means error and
MARK> FALSE means success.

It's all what you get used to.

From a C point of view, it's more logical that 0 means 'ok' and
something else means error as there is only one ok and many errors.

Regards,
Monty