From: Davi Arnaut
Date: August 31 2010 4:56pm
Subject: Re: [STYLE] use true/false in C++, not TRUE/FALSE
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/internals/38047
Message-Id: <4C7D343F.8000202@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 8/31/10 1:54 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Please name one that doesn't :)

Microsoft Visual C++.

> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Davi Arnaut<davi.arnaut@stripped>  wrote:
>>
>> It should be obvious, but how long C99 has been around does not matter much.
>> Whether the compilers we rely upon are providing those C99 features is much
>> more important.
>>
>> On 8/31/10 1:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's WAY too early to standardize on C99 and stdbool.h. ;)
>>>
>>> -jay
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Guilhem Bichot
>>> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I guess the only solution to this, is to decrease the use of my_bool as
>>>> much
>>>> as possible, i.e. use bool in C++ code. my_bool would be confined to C
>>>> code
>>>> (which code does not evolve much nowadays).
>>>>
>>>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 31.08.2010 17:53:
>>>>>
>>>>> Behavior like this is unwelcoming to the community.
>>>>> (my_bool) 255 -->    TRUE
>>>>> (my_bool) 256 -->    FALSE
>>>>> (my_bool) 257 -->    TRUE
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Guilhem Bichot
>>>>> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, but what do you mean by "fix my_bool"? Could you please expand a
>>>>>> little bit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 26.08.2010 18:17:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are there plans to fix my_bool?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has been quiet on internals so I figured I would ask.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> MySQL Internals Mailing List
>>>> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals
>>>> To unsubscribe:
>>>>   http://lists.mysql.com/internals?unsub=jaypipes@stripped
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>