Re: [STYLE] use true/false in C++, not TRUE/FALSE

[Jay Pipes]

Please name one that doesn't :)

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Davi Arnaut <davi.arnaut@stripped> wrote:
>
> It should be obvious, but how long C99 has been around does not matter much.
> Whether the compilers we rely upon are providing those C99 features is much
> more important.
>
> On 8/31/10 1:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, it's WAY too early to standardize on C99 and stdbool.h. ;)
>>
>> -jay
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Guilhem Bichot
>> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I guess the only solution to this, is to decrease the use of my_bool as
>>> much
>>> as possible, i.e. use bool in C++ code. my_bool would be confined to C
>>> code
>>> (which code does not evolve much nowadays).
>>>
>>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 31.08.2010 17:53:
>>>>
>>>> Behavior like this is unwelcoming to the community.
>>>> (my_bool) 255 -->  TRUE
>>>> (my_bool) 256 -->  FALSE
>>>> (my_bool) 257 -->  TRUE
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Guilhem Bichot
>>>> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but what do you mean by "fix my_bool"? Could you please expand
> a
>>>>> little bit?
>>>>>
>>>>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 26.08.2010 18:17:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there plans to fix my_bool?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has been quiet on internals so I figured I would ask.
>>>
>>> --
>>> MySQL Internals Mailing List
>>> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals
>>> To unsubscribe:
>>>  http://lists.mysql.com/internals?unsub=1
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>