Re: [STYLE] use true/false in C++, not TRUE/FALSE

[Davi Arnaut]

It should be obvious, but how long C99 has been around does not matter 
much. Whether the compilers we rely upon are providing those C99 
features is much more important.

On 8/31/10 1:41 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Yeah, it's WAY too early to standardize on C99 and stdbool.h. ;)
>
> -jay
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Guilhem Bichot
> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>  wrote:
>> I guess the only solution to this, is to decrease the use of my_bool as much
>> as possible, i.e. use bool in C++ code. my_bool would be confined to C code
>> (which code does not evolve much nowadays).
>>
>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 31.08.2010 17:53:
>>>
>>> Behavior like this is unwelcoming to the community.
>>> (my_bool) 255 -->  TRUE
>>> (my_bool) 256 -->  FALSE
>>> (my_bool) 257 -->  TRUE
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Guilhem Bichot
>>> <guilhem.bichot@stripped>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Sure, but what do you mean by "fix my_bool"? Could you please expand a
>>>> little bit?
>>>>
>>>> MARK CALLAGHAN a écrit, Le 26.08.2010 18:17:
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there plans to fix my_bool?
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been quiet on internals so I figured I would ask.
>>
>> --
>> MySQL Internals Mailing List
>> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals
>> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/internals?unsub=1
>>
>>
>