From: Mats Kindahl Date: August 27 2010 7:40am Subject: Ignore this, incomplete [Was: [STYLE] Self-sufficient header files] List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/internals/38038 Message-Id: <4C776BF9.1030005@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/27/2010 09:35 AM, Mats Kindahl wrote: > Proposal > ====== > > Every header file should be self-sufficient in the sense that for a > header file my_header.h, the following should compile without errors: > > #include "my_header.h" > > An exception is made for generated files, for example, those generated > by Yacc and Lex, since it is not possible to re-write the generators to > produce "correct" files. > > Rationale > ====== > > Source files should not include more than necessary, in particular, they > should not include header files for features that are not used in that > file. In the case that a header file (say, "my_header.h") uses some > feature (for example, a type, class, or function) from another header > file (say "my_other.h"), it is therefore necessary to ensure that this > feature is defined when "my_header.h" is needed in a source file (say, > "my_code.cc"). There are two ways to accomplish this: > > 1. Include first "my_other.h" and then "my_header.h" in every source > file where "my_header.h" is necessary. > 2. Include "my_other.h" in "my_header.h". > > Method 1 has a few disadvantages: > > * It places an unnecessary burden on the author of the source file > "my_code.cc", which may not be the same as the author of > "my_header.h". > o It would require the author of "my_code.cc" to read > "my_header.h" and realize that "my_other.h" is required. > o It would further require the author of "my_code.cc" to read > "my_other.h" to realize what is needed there, and this > applies recursively to every file in the include chain. > * If the definitions inside "my_header.h" should change, it is > necessary to change all the source files that use "my_header.h". > For a closed system, this is possible, but in the case that there > are third-party users of the header file, it is not possible. > * It would be possible to restrict this rule to only cover header > files that make up the external interface, but since there is no > reasonable advantage to have such a restriction, I propose that > the rule is kept as simple as possible. > > Method 2 has one disadvantage: > > * The compile has to read frequently included files several times, > which might impact compile time. > o Considering the size of the paging system on most machines > today, I believe that this is a non-problem since frequently > included header files will be available in the page cache. > o Designing coding style rules for compilation speed is a bad > idea. > > >