| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Guilhem Bichot | Date: | August 10 2010 8:29am |
| Subject: | Re: conclusions [Re: post-push emails useless?] | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Konstantin Osipov a écrit, Le 10.08.2010 08:13: > * Guilhem Bichot <guilhem.bichot@stripped> [10/08/10 01:33]: > >> So the latest proposal, which is easy to implement, is: >> - we keep sending post-push mails >> - we don't include any bundle in the post-push mail; a bundle is not >> needed, as the revision was just made available in the tree >> - we limit the diff's size to 10,000 (no reason to generate huge >> diffs which the mailing list will reject anyway, and which no one >> will read). >> There is also a proposal for commit mails, which have the same >> slowness problem: >> - same diff size limit as above > > Is it possible to send commit headers only, rather than > send nothing at all if the diff itself is too big? yes, the plan is: if the diff is too big, we don't include the diff; the rest of the mail is sent (commit comment, list of merged revisions).
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • post-push emails useless? | Guilhem Bichot | 29 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Stewart Smith | 29 Jul |
| • RE: post-push emails useless? | Vladislav Vaintroub | 29 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Harrison Fisk | 29 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Stewart Smith | 29 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Timour Katchaounov | 30 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Konstantin Osipov | 30 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Kristian Nielsen | 30 Jul |
| • Re: post-push emails useless? | Mats Kindahl | 4 Aug |
| • conclusions [Re: post-push emails useless?] | Guilhem Bichot | 9 Aug |
| • Re: conclusions [Re: post-push emails useless?] | Konstantin Osipov | 10 Aug |
| • Re: conclusions [Re: post-push emails useless?] | Guilhem Bichot | 10 Aug |
