List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Konstantin Osipov Date:March 4 2010 8:22pm
Subject:Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE
View as plain text  
* Sinisa Milivojevic <Sinisa.Milivojevic@stripped> [10/03/04 22:31]:
>> They are solved with the current table locks.
>>
>> WL#3561 table locks still lead to deadlocks.
>>
>
> Kostja,
>
> You are talking here about 5.1 or 5.5 and higher ???

I've only seen WL#3561 in 6.0.
Thread
Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEIngo Strüwing4 Mar
  • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEKonstantin Osipov4 Mar
  • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLESergei Golubchik4 Mar
Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEKonstantin Osipov4 Mar
  • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEIngo Strüwing4 Mar
    • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEKonstantin Osipov4 Mar
Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLEKonstantin Osipov4 Mar