| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Konstantin Osipov | Date: | March 4 2010 6:33pm |
| Subject: | Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | ||
| View as plain text | |||
* Sinisa Milivojevic <Sinisa.Milivojevic@stripped> [10/03/04 21:31]: >> If we convert WRITE locks to exclusive storage engine locks, DDL under >> lock tables will again lead to numerous deadlocks, >> as it is the case in 5.1. >> > > Kostja, > > But, bugs like #989 are not solved with table locks anyway !! They are solved with the current table locks. WL#3561 table locks still lead to deadlocks.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Ingo Strüwing | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Konstantin Osipov | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Sergei Golubchik | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Konstantin Osipov | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Ingo Strüwing | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Konstantin Osipov | 4 Mar |
| • Re: Change request to WL#3561 - transactional LOCK TABLE | Konstantin Osipov | 4 Mar |
