| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Sergei Golubchik | Date: | February 10 2010 6:14pm |
| Subject: | Re: Cleanup proposal: Is the "sql-bench" subtree still useful in binary packages? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi, MARK! On Feb 10, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote: > > It's true that the comparisons results are not very usable anymore, > > but the sql-bench test is still a very good test to include: > > > > - It's tests totally different things than mysql-test-run > > - It can be used to very fast test for regression in base code. (We > > plan to make this part of our build system to test for regression > > and I suggest you do the same!) > > - It's also very easy to use for end users as a base to do a fast > > test of the speed of some specific feature and how different options > > affects this. > > I think sql-bench is underutilized. I will begin using it for my local > builds as a performance regression test. It might also be useful to > share results between developers. For dbas, it would be good to > improve it to a point where it could do basic performance testing to > compare different hardware and configurations. On the other hand, there's a project on launchpad dedicated to sql-bench, and perhaps, there's no compelling reason to have sql-bench also in mysql/mariadb trees ? Regards, Sergei
