| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Mats Kindahl | Date: | October 21 2009 9:42am |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Konstantin Osipov wrote: > * Mats Kindahl <mats@stripped> [09/10/03 10:00]: >> If this can be accomplished, then the embedded server would not be a separate >> directory, but rather just a separate target in the Makefile that builds an >> archive consisting of the components that are required for the embedded server. > > This can be accomplished. I think this approach is what we should strive for. -- Mats Kindahl Senior Software Engineer Database Technology Group Sun Microsystems
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • RFC: package group names / directory names | Mats Kindahl | 10 Sep |
| • Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | Mats Kindahl | 2 Oct |
| • Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | Davi Arnaut | 2 Oct |
| • Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | Mats Kindahl | 3 Oct |
| • Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | Konstantin Osipov | 21 Oct |
| • Re: RFC: package group names / directory names | Mats Kindahl | 21 Oct |
