| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Kristian Nielsen | Date: | October 20 2009 3:01pm |
| Subject: | Re: Unit testing | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Jay Pipes <Jay.Pipes@stripped> writes: > I think having mysqltest for the functional SQL testing is necessary > and there isn't a comparable framework for that kind of testing "out > in the open". On the contrast, there are many quality unit testing > libraries in the open source space. Yes, we need two. But three? Or was the plan to port the existing unit tests to a new system? If the new system is significantly better in some way, I guess that might make sense... - Kristian.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Unit testing | Tor Didriksen | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Kristian Nielsen | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Tor Didriksen | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Jay Pipes | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Kristian Nielsen | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Sergei Golubchik | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Kristian Nielsen | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Tor Didriksen | 21 Oct |
| • RE: Unit testing | Vladislav Vaintroub | 21 Oct |
| • Re: Unit testing | Tor Didriksen | 22 Oct |
