Mats Kindahl wrote:
> Ingo Strüwing wrote:
>> Hi Mats,
>> Mats Kindahl, 19.10.2009 15:08:
>>> Hi Ingo,
>>> I don't know either, but I would be fine with a call for a meeting, say, once
>>> week if there are outstanding proposals that should be handled.
>>> Who is the chair? Kostja?
>> The specification does not mention a "chair". But it was Kostja, who
>> drove the process so far. Unfortunately, he is low of time.
>> Some observations/suggestions.
>> The one meeting held so far was a phone conference. This means that
>> there is only little log about it available. I suggest to consider an
>> IRC meeting next time.
>> There was critique from the community about poor involvement. I suggest
>> to consider ways to integrate a community vote somehow. Perhaps the
>> meeting could be done on FreeNode. This would need to be announced some
>> time in advance. Anyway, the people entitled to vote shall be selected
>> in advance. Not, who is there by chance shall vote.
>> The list of members of the committee might need to be updated.
> It makes sense.
> I don't have a strong opinion on using voice calls for the meetings, so IRC at
> Freenode sounds fine with me. Since we used a chat for the code examples last
> time anyway, it might even turn out better.
> Question is who should be a community representative? Of those relatively active
> on the mailing list with experience in working with the code I know only a few:
> Kristian, Mark (Facebook), and possibly Justin (Google).
You may also want to contact:
Calvin Sun or Heikki at Oracle
folks at Tokutek, Calpont, Infobright, etc