| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Konstantin Osipov | Date: | August 19 2009 10:54pm |
| Subject: | Re: why is the alarm thread used instead of SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO | ||
| View as plain text | |||
* Vladimir Shebordaev <vladimir.shebordaev@stripped> [09/08/20 02:19]: > I'm not quite deep into the history but as far as I can see vio layer > does honor those socket options on the platforms they are implemented > and expected to be working. Btw, POSIX does not require thes options > to be settable. Right, but we don't need to rely on them either. poll/select should do fine on all platforms we support nowadays. --
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • why is the alarm thread used instead of SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO | MARK CALLAGHAN | 19 Aug |
| • Re: why is the alarm thread used instead of SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO | Konstantin Osipov | 19 Aug |
| • Re: why is the alarm thread used instead of SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO | Vladimir Shebordaev | 19 Aug |
| • Re: why is the alarm thread used instead of SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO | Konstantin Osipov | 20 Aug |
