| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Brian Aker | Date: | July 2 2009 8:47pm |
| Subject: | Re: store_lock (turning off all locks) | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi! On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Slava Akhmechet wrote: >> FLUSH TABLE have no effect on your engine, i.e. allow them to >> proceed concurrently with all statements and each other? > May be. If full isolation is implemented efficiently, it might be FWIW I have made FLUSH TABLE before be recognized as an isolation point. LOCK TABLE you can not really get around... the answer there may be to toss an error. Cheers, -Brian
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • store_lock (turning off all locks) | Slava Akhmechet | 2 Jul |
| • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks) | Konstantin Osipov | 2 Jul |
| • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks) | Slava Akhmechet | 2 Jul |
| • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks) | Brian Aker | 2 Jul |
| • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks) | Davi Arnaut | 2 Jul |
