List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Slava Akhmechet Date:July 2 2009 10:38pm
Subject:Re: store_lock (turning off all locks)
View as plain text  
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Konstantin Osipov<kostja@stripped> wrote:
> Can your engine process DROP TABLE concurrently with SELECT?
Actually, at least on Linux this isn't very difficult since the kernel
reference counts the inodes. If one thread unlinks the files while the
other is reading them, that's no problem.

> Do you really want MySQL statements LOCK TABLE <table> WRITE and
> FLUSH TABLE have no effect on your engine, i.e. allow them to
> proceed concurrently with all statements and each other?
May be. If full isolation is implemented efficiently, it might be
reasonable to implement LOCK TABLE as a noop. Anyway, I am concerned
with understanding how store_lock (and MySQL locking) works, and I'm
doing some trial and error for the learning process. This part of the
trial is downgrading all locks to no locking and seeing what happens
:) Could someone clear up how to do that?

Regards,
- Slava
Thread
store_lock (turning off all locks)Slava Akhmechet2 Jul 2009
  • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks)Konstantin Osipov2 Jul 2009
    • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks)Slava Akhmechet2 Jul 2009
      • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks)Brian Aker2 Jul 2009
      • Re: store_lock (turning off all locks)Davi Arnaut2 Jul 2009