On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:20:50 +0200, Konstantin Osipov <kostja@stripped>
wrote:
> * Tor Didriksen <Tor.Didriksen@stripped> [09/06/17 16:51]:
>
> The old emacs extract was from Monty, I suggest you just edit the wiki
> directly and add update it.
>
Sure, I can edit the wiki (but I would need approval from the group of six
maintainers, right?)
But I would rather have it as file which I can simply execute when
starting emacs.
>>
>> Note that I have added (inline-open . 0) which seems to be the current
>> style.
>
> What does it mean? (I'm not an emacs user).
That means that we write
class Foo {
void func()
{
}
}
rather than
class Foo {
void func()
{
}
}
i.e. dont increment indentation when opening an inline function body.
This isn't described in the style guide, but is what we actually do in the
code
(as far as I can tell anyways)
>>
>> Note that I have also added (innamespace . 0), that's a new suggestion
>> from me.
>
> And that?-)
Similarly:
namespace foo {
class XXX {
};
} // namespace foo
don't increment indentation within a namespace,
that would essentially indent the entire source file, reducing line length
from 80 to 78.
It would also re-indent everything if we decide to put some existing code
into a namespace.
>
>> I removed the font-lock stuff, since that is really a user preference,
>> and can be quite a nuisance for people who have problems seeing colors.
>
> What does that mean?-)
Emacs can use different colors for different syntactic elements of a
programming language.
Very convenient for those of us who can differentiate between green and
blue.
Not so convenient for the color blind.
>
>> As usual: comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
-- didrik
