On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Mats Kindahl<mats@stripped> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your comments. I will try to answer your questions below.
>
> MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
>> What is the first step?
>
> Seeing if there are any problems with this approach of a package structure.
>
> Once this is set, we enable a number of other worklogs (see WL#4737 for rough
> list of refactoring issues).
>
> W.r.t. the physical structure, the next steps are:
>
> 1. Fixing header files (WL#4877)
>
> 2. Providing a unified build frame (WL#4875)
>
> 3. Identifying candidate packages turn them into packages.
Sounds good. There will be a little pain for people (like me) who need
to update their patches during this transition. But we will be much
better off when this gets done.
--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@stripped