List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Brian Aker Date:May 22 2009 4:37pm
Subject:Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)
View as plain text  
Hi!

On May 22, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Alex Esterkin wrote:

> objects make very little sense to me.  I am not sure I understand the
> intended purpose and benefit of this development task and of Value

The theory is that there is a lot  of copying going on in the server  
and that a value object might solve some of this. It would also keep  
for a nice bit of abstraction around data held by engines.

The current system is very optimized for MyISAM/HEAP, and there may,  
or may not, be some gain in removing that to make the interface more  
optimum for other engines. See the earlier thread about the contents  
of row[] and the unireg in memory format.

Keep in mind that in all of the current trees MyISAM/HEAP are used as  
internal temp tables and that any change could easily result in poor  
performance in the core.

Cheers,
    -Brian




Thread
Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen22 May
  • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Konstantin Osipov22 May
    • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Alex Esterkin22 May
      • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Brian Aker22 May
        • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Alex Esterkin22 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Brian Aker22 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Sergei Golubchik23 May
        • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Konstantin Osipov23 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Brian Aker23 May
    • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen22 May
      • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Konstantin Osipov22 May
        • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Alex Esterkin22 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen25 May
        • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen24 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Konstantin Osipov24 May
      • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Konstantin Osipov23 May
        • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen25 May
          • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Michael Widenius6 Jun
            • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen8 Jun
            • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Jay Pipes8 Jun
              • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Jay Pipes8 Jun
  • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Jay Pipes24 May
    • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Øystein Grøvlen25 May
      • Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Jay Pipes26 May
    • Re: [Drizzle-discuss] Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Jim Starkey28 May
Re: Value objects and Protocol (WL#4760)Brian Aker22 May