List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:He Zhenxing Date:May 18 2009 3:01am
Subject:Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687
View as plain text  
Alfranio Correia wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Find some comments in-line.

[ snip ]

> >   
> >> 3) N T...: the beginning part is non-transactional, followed by
> >> transactional
> >> statements.
> >>     
> >
> > In this case, the beginning part of non-transactional statements should
> > be logged separately and written to binlog directly in all modes. There
> > is nothing unsafe while binlogging the first non-transactional part. And
> > then the reset part T... will be either a T...T or TN..., which are
> > handled by 1) or 4).
> >   
> I really don't like this idea of handling this case differently.
> However, this is my personal opinion.

I think we have to do this to be compatible with the old behavior as
much as possible.


Thread
Feedback needed for WL#2687Alfranio Correia13 May
  • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687Mats Kindahl13 May
    • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687Alfranio Correia13 May
  • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687He Zhenxing14 May
    • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687He Zhenxing14 May
    • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687Alfranio Correia15 May
      • Re: Feedback needed for WL#2687He Zhenxing18 May
  • re: Feedback needed for WL#2687Michael Widenius14 May