List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Davi Arnaut Date:May 13 2009 1:30am
Subject:Re: MySQL Reengineering Project
View as plain text  
On 5/12/09 5:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Sergei Golubchik wrote:
>
>>>>> Without doing this, and using encapsulation so that a THD can have
>>>>> multiple Statements, it will be very difficult to work on any future
>>>>> parallelization efforts.
>>>> You mean, a Statement can have multiple THDs, I suppose :)
>>> No he means what he is saying. I don't know why you would want a
>>> statement shared across multiple THD, but having a THD be able to
>>> handle multiple statements means that you can do asynchronous queries
>>> within a single connection.
>>
>> Ah, okay. I see.
>>
>> I thought that "parallelization", that Jay mentioned, means executing
>> parts of a single statement in different threads - which, indeed, may
>> need two THDs sharing the same Statement.
>
> Yes, what Brian says...once the THD is distinguised from a pthread,
> intra-statement parallelization is possible. We've only just begun this
> step in Drizzle (a Session is now no longer intricately linked to a
> pthread in Drizzle) but there's clearly a ton more to do. :) I know Alex
> Esterkin thinks there is no reason to do such as thing, but perhaps he
> just needs an example :)
>
> Imagine a Session which sends a few long-running SELECTs in the same
> client connection. Currently, because the THD is linked to a single
> pthread in MySQL, these SELECTs will not only block each other, but will
> be executed in order. What if there was no reason to do so? The three
> Statements, if a Session contained a vector of Statement objects, could
> parse and optimize all three statements and decide to send two of them
> off to other scheduler threads for execution, essentially parallelizing
> the operation (particularly on a distributed node architecture...)
>

Jay,

What are the advantages of this schema over making a session as 
lightweight as possible and the user using multiple sessions? The latter 
seems less complicated and could yield better parallelism if the right 
cards are played within the server.

Davi
Thread
MySQL Reengineering ProjectManyi Lu - Sun Norway12 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJay Pipes12 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMARK CALLAGHAN12 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectManyi Lu - Sun Norway12 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectStewart Smith13 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMikiya Okuno18 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectSergei Golubchik18 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectRoy Lyseng18 May 2009
Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlaric Snell-Pym12 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJay Pipes12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJay Pipes12 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin12 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBrian Aker12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectSergei Golubchik12 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBrian Aker12 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectSergei Golubchik12 May 2009
            • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin12 May 2009
              • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBrian Aker12 May 2009
            • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJay Pipes12 May 2009
              • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectDavi Arnaut13 May 2009
              • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin13 May 2009
                • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJay Pipes13 May 2009
            • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMichael Widenius14 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectJonas Oreland13 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectRoy Lyseng12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlaric Snell-Pym12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMichael Widenius14 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlaric Snell-Pym15 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectKristian Nielsen15 May 2009
            • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBrian Aker15 May 2009
            • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlaric Snell-Pym15 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMichael Widenius6 Jun 2009
Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMats Kindahl12 May 2009
Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin12 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMasood Mortazavi13 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBrian Aker13 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin13 May 2009
      • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBaron Schwartz13 May 2009
        • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectStewart Smith13 May 2009
          • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectBaron Schwartz13 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectAlex Esterkin13 May 2009
    • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectStewart Smith13 May 2009
  • Re: MySQL Reengineering ProjectMichael Widenius14 May 2009