| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Vyacheslav Akhmechet | Date: | May 11 2009 5:29pm |
| Subject: | Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Paul, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Paul McCullagh <paul.mccullagh@stripped> wrote: > As far as I know, you will need a maximum of one buffer per BLOB > column per handler. So at the end of each read_row, the server copies BLOB data from the engine's buffer to its own? This seems a bit odd (because each BLOB requires a memcpy that could potentially be avoided). However, if it does work this way, it makes things a lot easier from the storage engine's point of view. Regards, - Slava
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Vyacheslav Akhmechet | 11 May |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Paul McCullagh | 11 May |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Vyacheslav Akhmechet | 11 May |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Paul McCullagh | 11 May |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Vyacheslav Akhmechet | 11 May |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Michael Widenius | 5 Jun |
| • Re: BLOB memory deallocation (storage engine dev) | Michael Widenius | 5 Jun |
