Re: [patch] plugin build process improvements

[Antony Dovgal]

On 03.04.2009 17:17, Chad MILLER wrote:
> Not yet, sorry.  I'm almost certain that there are structures that 
> really should be hidden, but I am not enough conversant in our 
> storage-engine Best Practices to know what should be exposed.
> 
> It's funny psycologically, that if you had submitted a patch that 
> included all but one file, I would not be so troubled by it, regardless 
> of its correctness.  But *all* headers, that really bothers me.

I'd be happy to modify the patch, but I just don't know what (and why) you'd like to
'hide'.

Also, I believe that any structures/defines/whatever used in MySQL *theoretically* might
be 
(or will be) useful for the plugins; so if you 'hide' them now, you'll have to 'unhide'
them later.

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal