| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Michael Widenius | Date: | May 17 2002 8:54am |
| Subject: | Re: Table lock with join. | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi! >>>>> "Jocelyn" == Jocelyn Fournier <joc@stripped> writes: Jocelyn> Hi, Jocelyn> So if I want overall high performance (i.e. no lock) I should stay away from Jocelyn> join (or create alternate tables used only with join) ? It depends on the problem at hand; In many cases it's hard to avoid joins. If you have a setup where you need long reads mixed with writes, then using InnoDB tables is a good solution. Regards, Monty
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Table lock with join. | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 1 May |
| • Table lock with join. | Michael Widenius | 16 May |
| • Re: Table lock with join. | Jocelyn Fournier | 16 May |
| • Re: Table lock with join. | Michael Widenius | 17 May |
