From: Date: June 12 2008 3:36pm Subject: Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API) List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/internals/35690 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! On Jun 12, 2008, at 6:13 AM, Sergei Golubchik wrote: > OXS (Mark, Brian) was few times slower than a built-in function. On > Linux (my laptop with Gentoo) there was no noticeable difference. Did anyone document your experiment? The trainers have been repeating this bit of information. I've not seen anyone blog to the contrary the original "UDF's are slower". It would be interesting to know how FreeBSD stacked up on this. Cheers, -Brian BTW OSX to me is great for development, but as a production server? Forget it. If the performance costs are essentially the same on linux, this furthers the argument that more functions should be stripped from the server and shipped optionally. -- _______________________________________________________ Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org Seattle, Washington http://krow.net/ <-- Me http://tangent.org/ <-- Software _______________________________________________________ You can't grep a dead tree.