List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Sergei Golubchik Date:June 12 2008 3:13pm
Subject:Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine
API)
View as plain text  
Hi!

On Jun 12, Brian Aker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> One thing to know about UDF's is that the last benchmark I saw hey are 
> about 3X lower then a normal function. If you find that you need better 
> performance, just add an item function to the database directly.

Only on OSX. We've verified that on the UC - same function compiled on
OXS (Mark, Brian) was few times slower than a built-in function. On
Linux (my laptop with Gentoo) there was no noticeable difference.

Regards / Mit vielen Grüssen,
Sergei

-- 
   __  ___     ___ ____  __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /   Sergei Golubchik <serg@stripped>
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__  Principal Software Engineer/Server Architect
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/  Sun Microsystems GmbH, HRB München 161028
       <___/                  Sonnenallee 1, 85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Häring
Thread
Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Kazuho Oku11 Jun
  • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Brian Aker11 Jun
    • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Kazuho Oku12 Jun
      • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Brian Aker12 Jun
        • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engineAPI)Sergei Golubchik12 Jun
          • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Brian Aker12 Jun
        • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Kazuho Oku13 Jun
          • Re: Stored Procedures in C++? (and direct access to storage engine API)Kazuho Oku13 Jun