Re: Review of second patch for Bug#25615, "Status command doesn't report anymore the Queries per second avg"

[Baron Schwartz]

Slightly off-topic n00b question, but I hope you don't mind:

> In particular, I'm interested in the results of:
> 
> char foo[20];
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%0f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.0f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%09.4f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.1f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 3, ">%.1f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 4, ">%.1f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.3f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.4f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%+.4f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%+.5f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.6f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%.7f<", 0.987654321098765432);
> my_snprintf(foo, 10, ">%80f<", 0.987654321098765432);

Is there anything magical about 0.987654321098765432 as a test number?

Thanks for your time!
Baron