List:Internals« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:sasha Date:March 5 2002 3:48pm
Subject:bk commit into 4.0 tree
View as plain text  
Below is the list of changes that have just been committed into a
4.0 repository of sasha. When sasha does a push, they will be propogated to 
the main repository and within 24 hours after the push to the public repository. 
For information on how to access the public repository
see http://www.mysql.com/doc/I/n/Installing_source_tree.html

ChangeSet@stripped, 2002-03-05 08:48:03-07:00, sasha@stripped
  replication documentation update

  Docs/manual.texi
    1.773 02/03/05 08:48:01 sasha@stripped +34 -6
    replication documentation update

# This is a BitKeeper patch.  What follows are the unified diffs for the
# set of deltas contained in the patch.  The rest of the patch, the part
# that BitKeeper cares about, is below these diffs.
# User:	sasha
# Host:	mysql.sashanet.com
# Root:	/reiser-data/mysql-4.0

--- 1.772/Docs/manual.texi	Fri Mar  1 18:58:19 2002
+++ 1.773/Docs/manual.texi	Tue Mar  5 08:48:01 2002
@@ -23430,7 +23430,7 @@
 with @code{SLAVE START} and see
 if you have better luck next time. There will be a cleaner solution, but it
 has to wait until version 4.0.
-In earlier versions temporary tables are not being replicated properly - we
+In earlier versions temporary tables are not replicated properly - we
 recommend that you either upgrade, or execute @code{SET SQL_LOG_BIN=0} on
 your clients before all queries with temp tables.
 @item
@@ -23504,11 +23504,6 @@
 compatibility.
 
 @item
-Starting in Version 3.23.21, you can use @code{LOAD TABLE FROM MASTER} for
-network backup and to set up replication initially. We have recently
-received a number of bug reports concerning it that we are investigating, so
-we recommend that you use it only in testing until we make it more stable.
-@item
 Starting in Version 3.23.23, you can change masters and adjust log position
 with @code{CHANGE MASTER TO}.
 @item
@@ -23521,6 +23516,39 @@
 @item
 Starting in Version 3.23.28, you can use @code{PURGE MASTER LOGS TO 'log-name'}
 to get rid of old logs while the slave is running.
+@item
+Due to the non-transactional nature of MyISAM tables, it is possible to have
+a query that will only partially update a table and return an error code. This
+can happen, for example, on a multi-row insert that has one row violating a
+key constraint, or if a long update query is killed after updating some of the
+rows. If that happens on the master, the slave thread will exit and wait for
+the DBA to decide what to do about it unless the error code is legitimate and
+the query execution results in the same error code. If this error code
+validation behaviour is not desirable, some ( or all) errors could be masked
+out with @code{slave-skip-errors} option starting in Version 3.23.47.
+@item
+While individual tables can be excluded from replication with
+@code{replicate-do-table}/@code{replicate-ignore-table} or
+@code{replicate-wild-do-table}/@code{replicate-wild-ignore-table}, there
+are currently some design deficiencies that in some rather rare cases
+produce unexpected results. The replication protocol does not inform the
+slave explicitly which tables are going to be modified by the query - so
+the slave has to parse the query to know this. To avoid redundant
+parsing for queries that will end up actually being executed, table
+exclusion is currently implemented by sending the query to the standard
+MySQL parser, which will short-circuit the query and report success if
+it detects that the table should be ignored. In addition to several
+inefficiencies, this approach is also more bug prone, and there are two
+known bugs as of Version 3.23.49 - because the parser automatically opens
+the table when parsing some queries the ignored table has to exist on
+the slave. The other bug is that if the ignored table gets partially
+updated, the slave thread will not notice that the table actually should
+have been ignored and will suspend the replication process. While the
+above bugs are conceptually very simple to fix, we have not yet found a way
+to do this without a sigficant code change that would compromize the stability
+status of 3.23 branch. There exists a workaround for both if in the rare case
+it happens to affect your application -  use @code{slave-skip-errors}.
+
 @end itemize
 
 
Thread
bk commit into 4.0 treesasha5 Mar