| List: | Internals | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Michael Widenius | Date: | September 7 2001 12:21am |
| Subject: | Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi! >>>>> "Timothy" == Timothy Smith <tim@stripped> writes: Timothy> On 2001 Sep 06, Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] <joc@stripped> > wrote: >> It doesn't change anything, the query is still slow. Timothy> OK, I believe that the optimization is not being done because Timothy> MySQL doesn't realize that the ORDER BY is on the second part Timothy> of the same key that is used for the WHERE clause. Timothy> This might not be easy to fix in a general way, but we will Timothy> look into it. When doing an ordinary ORDER BY (ASC), MySQL can optimize this case. It should not be hard to do the same thing when using DESC. As Tim said, we will look at this shortly. (I want to first get 4.0 out before looking deeply into this) Regards, Monty
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 5 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Timothy Smith | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 6 Sep |
| • ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Michael Widenius | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Paul Cadach | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Paul Cadach | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Fournier Jocelyn [Presence-PC] | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Timothy Smith | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Michael Widenius | 6 Sep |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Michael Widenius | 16 Jan |
| • Re: ORDER BY ... DESC LIMIT 1 optimization ? | Paul Cadach | 6 Sep |
