From: Paul Wilson
Date: September 24 2012 7:30pm
Subject: Re: Issue while converting a table from MyISAM to InnoDB
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/innodb/66
Message-Id: <CAKs83S8xM-59vAjTTkYyGJm5kScsyorsDosbkYMepaOMcT=VFQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428c26d7655104ca779dbf

--f46d04428c26d7655104ca779dbf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

unsubscribe

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Rahul Jha <rahuljha088@stripped> wrote:

> Hi, I have found this difference while converting one of the table from
> MyISAM to InnoDB engine. I am giving you the differences what i noticed.
> Could you please answer the possible reason for this.
> *Name of the Table                 No of Rows                  Size
>       Engine*
> Profile                                      367,140
>  81.0 M.B.          MyISAM
> Profile                                      366,268
> 119.2 M.B.         InnoDB
>
> in Innodb we are getting 872 lesser rows. what could be the possible reason
> for this?
> P.S. we don't have any Multimedia file in this table.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul
>

--f46d04428c26d7655104ca779dbf--