List:Falcon Storage Engine« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Ann W. Harrison Date:April 1 2009 2:24pm
Subject:Re: statement-level atomicity
View as plain text  
Jim Starkey wrote:
> "Repeatable read" and "read committed", definition, are not consistent 
> and not isolated, so, no, they aren't ACID.
> 

Jim's talking about the standard form of Repeatable Read which has
phantoms - newly committed records will be seen, though no records
that have been read will be deleted or updated.  The MVCC version of
repeatable read is repeatable.

Cheers,

Ann
Thread
statement-level atomicityKevin Lewis31 Mar
  • Re: statement-level atomicityAnn W. Harrison31 Mar
Re: statement-level atomicityPhilip Stoev31 Mar
  • Re: statement-level atomicityKevin Lewis31 Mar
  • Re: statement-level atomicityJim Starkey31 Mar
    • Re: statement-level atomicityAnn W. Harrison1 Apr