| List: | Falcon Storage Engine | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jim Starkey | Date: | March 25 2009 3:18pm |
| Subject: | Re: why comment BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) in SyncObject::lock? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hu, Xuekun wrote: > Hi, Guys > > I am just curious why BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) was commented that the shared > statistics was missing. For performance or mis-functionality reason? Thanks in advance. > > Thx, Xuekun > > Probably because it was causing 100% overhead in performance. -- Jim Starkey President, NimbusDB, Inc. 978 526-1376
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • why comment BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) in SyncObject::lock? | Xuekun Hu | 25 Mar |
| • Re: why comment BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) in SyncObject::lock? | Jim Starkey | 25 Mar |
| • Re: why comment BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) in SyncObject::lock? | Kevin Lewis | 25 Mar |
| • RE: why comment BUMP_INTERLOCKED(sharedCount) in SyncObject::lock? | Xuekun Hu | 25 Mar |
