List:Falcon Storage Engine« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Vladislav Vaintroub Date:February 18 2009 4:37pm
Subject:RE: Patch for bug#42208
View as plain text  
Sorry,  I was wrong.
Jim is not sure that does "not" work. I missed to mentally apply the
negation of negation rule , which leads to "Jim is sure it does work".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladislav.Vaintroub@stripped [mailto:Vladislav.Vaintroub@stripped]
> On Behalf Of Vladislav Vaintroub
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:19 PM
> To: 'Jim Starkey'
> Cc: Kevin.Lewis@stripped; 'Lars-Erik Bjørk'; 'FalconDev'
> Subject: RE: Patch for bug#42208
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Starkey [mailto:jstarkey@stripped]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:10 PM
> > To: Vladislav Vaintroub
> > Cc: Kevin.Lewis@stripped; 'Lars-Erik Bjørk'; 'FalconDev'
> > Subject: Re: Patch for bug#42208
> >
> >
> > >
> > No, Vlad.  I'm not sure that it doesn't work.  The essence of the
> > scheme is:
> 
> Jim , please, give a counterexample. "Being sure" just sounds too vague
> for
> me:) Basically I'm saying that  if all strings (byte arrays) are
> transformed
> such as 0 changes to 0x1 0x0 and 1 to 0x01 0x01 the order is preserved.
> I gave enough examples. Where are yours?
> 
> 
> --
> Falcon Storage Engine Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/falcon
> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/falcon?unsub=1


Thread
Patch for bug#42208Lars-Erik Bjørk16 Feb
  • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub16 Feb
    • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub16 Feb
      • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey16 Feb
        • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub16 Feb
    • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey16 Feb
      • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub16 Feb
      • Re: Patch for bug#42208Lars-Erik Bjørk17 Feb
        • Re: Patch for bug#42208Kevin Lewis17 Feb
          • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
            • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
              • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                • Re: Patch for bug#42208Kevin Lewis18 Feb
                  • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                    • Re: Patch for bug#42208Kevin Lewis18 Feb
          • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
            • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
              • Re: Patch for bug#42208Kevin Lewis18 Feb
                • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
                  • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
              • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey18 Feb
                • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
                  • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey18 Feb
                    • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
                      • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
            • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
              • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
                • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey18 Feb
                  • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                    • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                  • RE: Patch for bug#42208Vladislav Vaintroub18 Feb
                    • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
                    • Re: Patch for bug#42208Kevin Lewis18 Feb
                      • Re: Patch for bug#42208Ann W. Harrison18 Feb
      • Re: Patch for bug#42208MARK CALLAGHAN17 Feb
  • Re: Patch for bug#42208Jim Starkey16 Feb