List:Falcon Storage Engine« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Lars-Erik Bjørk Date:February 9 2009 8:38pm
Subject:bug#34478
View as plain text  
Hi all!

I don't have the the battery capacity to write a long mail now (lucky  
you!) :) I analyzed bug#34478 ( http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php? 
id=34478) which also narrows down to the use of 0x00 in index keys  
(this time as pad bytes in the deferred index). Does anyone have an  
opinion on how this bug can be avoided in a nice and correct fashion?  
Does it make any sense to pad with 0x00?

2 minutes capacity left, sorry the short mail, please see the report  
for a bit more elaborate version :)

Best,

Lars-Erik
Thread
bug#34478Lars-Erik Bjørk9 Feb
  • Re: bug#34478Kevin Lewis9 Feb
    • RE: bug#34478Vladislav Vaintroub9 Feb
      • Re: bug#34478Lars-Erik Bjørk10 Feb
        • RE: bug#34478Vladislav Vaintroub10 Feb
          • Re: bug#34478Lars-Erik Bjørk10 Feb
            • RE: bug#34478Vladislav Vaintroub10 Feb
              • Re: bug#34478Lars-Erik Bjørk10 Feb
                • RE: bug#34478Vladislav Vaintroub10 Feb
                  • Re: bug#34478Lars-Erik Bjørk11 Feb