| List: | Falcon Storage Engine | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Lars-Erik Bjørk | Date: | February 9 2009 8:38pm |
| Subject: | bug#34478 | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi all! I don't have the the battery capacity to write a long mail now (lucky you!) :) I analyzed bug#34478 ( http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php? id=34478) which also narrows down to the use of 0x00 in index keys (this time as pad bytes in the deferred index). Does anyone have an opinion on how this bug can be avoided in a nice and correct fashion? Does it make any sense to pad with 0x00? 2 minutes capacity left, sorry the short mail, please see the report for a bit more elaborate version :) Best, Lars-Erik
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • bug#34478 | Lars-Erik Bjørk | 9 Feb |
| • Re: bug#34478 | Kevin Lewis | 9 Feb |
| • RE: bug#34478 | Vladislav Vaintroub | 9 Feb |
| • Re: bug#34478 | Lars-Erik Bjørk | 10 Feb |
| • RE: bug#34478 | Vladislav Vaintroub | 10 Feb |
| • Re: bug#34478 | Lars-Erik Bjørk | 10 Feb |
| • RE: bug#34478 | Vladislav Vaintroub | 10 Feb |
| • Re: bug#34478 | Lars-Erik Bjørk | 10 Feb |
| • RE: bug#34478 | Vladislav Vaintroub | 10 Feb |
| • Re: bug#34478 | Lars-Erik Bjørk | 11 Feb |
