On Fr, 2009-01-09 at 14:15 +0100, Vladislav Vaintroub wrote:
> Another thought on WFTO . So far it is no more than just a numbers
> passed x % failed (100-x)%. If this even to be useful, there should be
> more information - how tests failed, did they crash, etc? is there
> anyone who will analyze why falcon_bug_22171 did not work on
> "esslingen", it will it just go unnoticed ?
- We have five tests failing on Mac OS X/PPC due to date
bug, which is a regression.
Other than that, you have a very valid point. However, before sending
the email, I am checking the failures for any unusual things.
For instance, a --big-test test was failing due to timeout and I
increased the timeout couple of weeks ago.
I do also a visual check by looking for regressed tests (the red cross).
Hakan Küçükyılmaz, Senior Software Engineer DBTG/MySQL +49 160
Sun Microsystems GmbH Sonnenallee 1, DE-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitz d. Aufs.rat.: Martin Haering HRB MUC 161028 49.011, 8.376