From: Olav Sandstaa
Date: December 3 2008 11:14am
Subject: Re: WL#4654 - New Falcon Dependency Manager
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/falcon/230
Message-Id: <493669FE.4020709@sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT

Kevin Lewis wrote:
> > Olav Sandstaa wrote:
> > Should we keep "transactionId" or change it to use "startEvent"?
> > BTW: there is 38 source files that refers to a transaction id.
>
> By all means, lets keep using transactionId as the name of the 
> startEvent since that is also how it is currently used.
>
> It is up to you, but I kind of prefer 'commitId' instead of 
> commitEvent or endEvent because it reminds us of the transactionId.

Thanks for your feedback and suggestion. I agree that commitId is better 
than commitEvent when using the transactionId as the "startEvent".

I will update the patch with the following changes:

  -use the transactionId as the startEvent (ie. get rid of the new 
startEvent).
  -rename the commitEvent to commitId.

Olav