List:Eventum General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Phillip Steinbachs Date:March 14 2005 10:15pm
Subject:Re: email replies?
View as plain text  

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse wrote:

>> Using simple procmail rules, things are sorted out into separate 
>> mailboxes. 
>
> Since Eventum does at least nominal investigation of the recipient address 
> anyway to suss out issue numbers when that feature is enabled, it would be 
> cool if Eventum could figure this out on its own without even the need for 
> extra IMAP mailboxes and procmail.
>
> (Though the ability to have Eventum move processed messages to a different 
> IMAP folder might come in handy here.)
>


That might be useful for some folks.  Advantages of going the procmail 
route and having separate IMAP mailboxes are disaster recovery, 
portability, and debugging.  In the very unlikely event an Eventum 
bug chews up a message or your DB goes away, you still have it sitting in 
the IMAP mailbox (note that we've never had this happen).  Having your 
messages in mbox or maildir lets you migrate more easily to something 
else in the future (doubtful, very doubtful).  Debugging is probably the 
most useful reason... it's nice to be able to see the messages in the 
mailboxes, and make sure they show up in the right place within Eventum 
(see my previous bug report today)

Until 1.5.1, there wasn't a way to move E-mails between projects in the 
event that a user sent to the wrong support alias.  In those cases, I 
would log into the Eventum system account and use pine to move things into 
the right places, setting the status flag on the E-mail to new.  Not an 
ideal solution, but it made things tolerable.

-phillip
Thread
email replies?Mark Sams14 Mar
  • RE: email replies?Joao Prado Maia14 Mar
    • Re: email replies?Elan Ruusamäe14 Mar
      • RE: email replies?Joao Prado Maia14 Mar
        • Re: email replies?Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse14 Mar
          • Re: email replies?Phillip Steinbachs14 Mar
            • Re: email replies?Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse14 Mar
              • Re: email replies?Phillip Steinbachs14 Mar
                • Re: email replies?Jeffrey D. Wheelhouse14 Mar
RE: email replies?Mark Sams15 Mar
  • RE: email replies?Joao Prado Maia21 Mar