List:MySQL and .NET« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:streamlake Date:December 22 2004 8:33am
Subject:RE: About float fields
View as plain text  
Thanks James,
I'm beginning to think that your suggestion looks to be a correct solution...
CommandBuilder lets me save some coding but it doesn't look particularly
flexible, or maybe I don't know it well enough... :-)

The same happens with automatic data binding with TextBoxes (Binding, BindingContext,
Parse and Format events, etc), it doesn't look much flexible apart from
basic operations, or at least it doesn't make me reduce code size.

Any other suggestions for the float problem?
Frank


>-- Messaggio Originale --
>From: "James Moore" <banshee@stripped>
>To: "'Frank'" <streamlake@stripped>, <dotnet@stripped>
>Subject: RE: About float fields
>Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:32:51 -0800
>
>
>My personal solution is to not use automatically generated SQL (ie, ditch
>CommandBuilder.)  I find that for the simple case building the commands
>myself is simple anyway, and in the more complex case CommandBuilder doesn't
>do what I need.  Not really a solution to your problem, but it's something
>to think about.
>
>  - James
>
>


__________________________________________________________________
Tiscali Adsl 2 Mega Free: l'adsl piu' veloce e' gratis!
Naviga libero dai costi fissi con Tiscali Adsl 2 Mega Free, l'adsl Free
piu' veloce in Italia. In piu', se ti abboni entro il 7 gennaio 2005,
navighi gratis fino al 31 marzo. E il costo di adesione e' GRATIS.
http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/



Thread
About float fieldsFrank22 Dec
  • RE: About float fieldsJames Moore22 Dec
    • RE: About float fieldsstreamlake22 Dec
      • RE: About float fieldsSGreen22 Dec
        • RE: About float fieldsJordan Sparks22 Dec
          • NULL returned for all entries after first NULLPatrick Questembert22 Dec
        • Re: About float fieldsFrank22 Dec