Please drop a line to license-feedback@stripped regarding the openssl
licensing issue - they can help you sort this out.
> A general comment: adding a couple of external URLs in the definition
> of the FLOSS
> is quite dangerous, they are subject to changes and could invalidate
> the license.
> I'm referring to the section:
> "Due to the many variants of some of the above licenses, we require
> that any
> version follow the 2003 version of the Free Software Foundation's Free
> Software Definition (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html)
> or version
> 1.9 of the Open Source Definition by the Open Source Initiative
> It could be safer to add them in appendix as enclosed documents.
Agreed. I have filed a bug report at