Approved pending changes.
1. Fix patch comments.
2. Remove blank space diff.
> BUG#47540: Backup unit tests errors on Solaris.
> The common error is the placement of plan() at the end
> of run_test().Tests passed when plan() is placed at the begining of
> run_test() adhering to unit test frame work.
> In few unit tests, where number of tests to planned are not known before hand,
> plan(NO_PLAN) was called. Whenever ok() fails, g_test.failed is incremented
> and failed tests are reported.
 Please keep comment lines to < about 70-75 characters and left align
the lines. Watch the extra tabs, grammar, and spelling too. ;)
Do something like this:
BUG#47540: Backup unit tests errors on Solaris.
The common error is the placement of plan() at the end
of run_test(). Tests passed when plan() is placed at the
beginning of run_test() adhering to unit test frame work.
In few unit tests, where number of tests to planned are
not known before hand, plan(NO_PLAN) was called. Whenever
ok() fails, g_test.failed is incremented (tap.c) and failed
tests are reported.
> === modified file 'unittest/backup/bstr_random_chunks-t.c'
> --- a/unittest/backup/bstr_random_chunks-t.c 2009-10-12 09:08:34 +0000
> +++ b/unittest/backup/bstr_random_chunks-t.c 2009-11-13 15:12:39 +0000
> @@ -44,9 +44,12 @@ void run_test()
> size_t byte_count;
> size_t csize;
> int ret;
> - uint planned;
> stream_block_size= BSIZE;
> + /*
> + Number of tests to be planned are not known at this point.
> + */
> + plan(NO_PLAN);
> @@ -62,7 +65,7 @@ void run_test()
> for(byte_count=0 ; byte_count < DATA_AMOUNT ; )
> csize= chunk_size[hash(CSIZE_NUM, chunk_count)];
 Please check your patches to make sure you are not doing any blank
space replacement (say by putting an extra space on the end of a line or
an extra blank line or removing a line for no stated reason).
Note: This is considered by many to be a condition for rejecting a
patch. I don't agree on that point but having had my own patches
rejected for this I will require you to fix this before pushing.