Hi Staale
OK to push, but please note in the changeset message that we are fixing
the Thread Id mishap and not the Statement Id. See my comment on the bug
report.
Thanks
On 6/11/09 11:09 AM, Staale Smedseng wrote:
> #At file:///export/home/tmp/ss156133/z/45387-51/ based on
> revid:pstoev@stripped
>
> 2935 Staale Smedseng 2009-06-11
> Bug #45387 Information about statement id for prepared
> statements missed from general log
>
> Insufficient separation between timetag and ID in the
> log file causes the ID to become intelligible. Separation
> is added, and a testcase is supplied which logs a few
> statements to file and parses and compares the actual
> and expected IDs.
