Below is the list of changes that have just been committed into a local
5.0 repository of psergey. When psergey does a push these changes will
be propagated to the main repository and, within 24 hours after the
push, to the public repository.
For information on how to access the public repository
see http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/installing-source-tree.html
ChangeSet
1.2138 06/05/16 13:39:03 sergefp@stripped +1 -0
BUG#19618: post-review fixes: better comments
sql/opt_range.cc
1.212 06/05/16 13:38:56 sergefp@stripped +39 -21
BUG#19618: post-review fixes: better comments
# This is a BitKeeper patch. What follows are the unified diffs for the
# set of deltas contained in the patch. The rest of the patch, the part
# that BitKeeper cares about, is below these diffs.
# User: sergefp
# Host: newbox.mylan
# Root: /home/psergey/mysql-5.0-bug19618
--- 1.211/sql/opt_range.cc 2006-05-15 14:18:17 +04:00
+++ 1.212/sql/opt_range.cc 2006-05-16 13:38:56 +04:00
@@ -3503,17 +3503,46 @@
if (inv)
{
- /*
- We get here for conditions like "t.keypart NOT IN (....)".
-
- If the IN-list contains only constants (and func->array is an ordered
- array of them), we construct the appropriate SEL_ARG tree manually,
- because constructing it using the range analyzer (as
- AND_i( t.keypart != c_i)) will cause lots of memory to be consumed
- (see BUG#15872).
- */
if (func->array && func->cmp_type != ROW_RESULT)
{
+ /*
+ We get here for conditions in form "t.key NOT IN (c1, c2, ...)"
+ (where c{i} are constants).
+ Our goal is to produce a SEL_ARG graph that represents intervals:
+
+ ($MIN<t.key<c1) OR (c1<t.key<c2) OR (c2<t.key<c3) OR ... (*)
+
+ where $MIN is either "-inf" or NULL.
+
+ The most straightforward way to handle NOT IN would be to convert
+ it to "(t.key != c1) AND (t.key != c2) AND ..." and let the range
+ optimizer to build SEL_ARG graph from that. However that will cause
+ the range optimizer to use O(N^2) memory (it's a bug, not filed),
+ and people do use big NOT IN lists (see BUG#15872). Also, for big
+ NOT IN lists constructing/using graph (*) does not make the query
+ faster.
+
+ So, we will handle NOT IN manually in the following way:
+ * if the number of entries in the NOT IN list is less then
+ NOT_IN_IGNORE_THRESHOLD, we will construct SEL_ARG graph (*)
+ manually.
+ * Otherwise, we will construct a smaller graph: for
+ "t.key NOT IN (c1,...cN)" we construct a graph representing
+ ($MIN < t.key) OR (cN < t.key) // here sequence of c_i is
+ // ordered.
+
+ A note about partially-covering indexes: for those (e.g. for
+ "a CHAR(10), KEY(a(5))") the handling is correct (albeit not very
+ efficient):
+ Instead of "t.key < c1" we get "t.key <= prefix-val(c1)".
+ Combining the intervals in (*) together, we get:
+ (-inf<=t.key<=c1) OR (c1<=t.key<=c2) OR (c2<=t.key<=c3) OR ...
+ i.e. actually we get intervals combined into one interval:
+ (-inf<=t.key<=+inf). This doesn't make much sense but it doesn't
+ cause any problems.
+ */
+ MEM_ROOT *tmp_root= param->mem_root;
+ param->thd->mem_root= param->old_root;
/*
Create one Item_type constant object. We'll need it as
get_mm_parts only accepts constant values wrapped in Item_Type
@@ -3522,24 +3551,13 @@
per-statement mem_root (while thd->mem_root is currently pointing
to mem_root local to range optimizer).
*/
- MEM_ROOT *tmp_root= param->mem_root;
- param->thd->mem_root= param->old_root;
Item *value_item= func->array->create_item();
param->thd->mem_root= tmp_root;
if (!value_item)
break;
- /*
- Get a SEL_TREE for "(-inf|NULL) < X < c_0" interval.
- Note: for partially-covering keys the returned tree may represent
- a half-closed interval (-inf < X <= c_0). In that case the for the
- whole NOT IN statement the (-inf < X < +inf) interval will be
- constructed. It doesn't make sense to consider range access over
- such intervals, but we don't eliminate them here as 1) they are
- handled correctly by all parts of the code, and 2) the case where
- such intervals are constructed is rare.
- */
+ /* Get a SEL_TREE for "(-inf|NULL) < X < c_0" interval. */
uint i=0;
do
{
| Thread |
|---|
| • bk commit into 5.0 tree (sergefp:1.2138) BUG#19618 | Sergey Petrunia | 16 May |