alfranio correia wrote:
> He Zhenxing wrote:
>
> Sorry for the delayed answer.
>
> See the in-line comment.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Hi Alfranio
> >
> > Nice work, just one comment, why not make option --sync-relay-log-info
> > act the same way as the others, I mean sync relay log every #th
> > transactions instead of every transaction? I think this will make all
> > these options more consistent, and users may not want to sync relay log
> > info for every transaction if they have a lots of small transactions.
> >
>
> I thought about that... though.
> In the future, this information will be written atomically within the
> context of a transaction, thus introducing a future that will be removed
> in the future is not a good idea.
>
Sorry, I don't quite understand your comment, what information that will
be written within the context of a transaction?
What I am thinking is that option --sync-relay-log-info is treated as a
boolean in your patch, it will enable sync relay-log.info for EVERY
transaction. While for option --sync-relay-log, it is used as a counter
too, and it will sync relay-log for EVERY #TH transactions.
> what do you think?
[ snip ]
