List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Chuck Bell Date:August 19 2008 3:04pm
Subject:RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073
View as plain text  
Oystein, 

> It is OK with me, but I am not sure it is in the 
> "best-effort" spirit of MySQL.  Seems like it is part of the 
> nature of grants that you can define whatever you want, 
> regardless of whether the objects exist.  Is it not possible 
> to just ignore the warnings on restore?

We cannot ignore them in the test on restore because the warning is
intentional. If a user does not exist on restore for grants stored in the
backup image, the system is supposed to issue the warning.

Chuck

Thread
bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell7 Aug
  • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Øystein Grøvlen18 Aug
    • RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell18 Aug
      • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Øystein Grøvlen18 Aug
        • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Øystein Grøvlen18 Aug
        • RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell18 Aug
          • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Øystein Grøvlen19 Aug
            • RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell19 Aug
            • RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell19 Aug
RE: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (cbell:2676) WL#4073Chuck Bell18 Aug