From: Date: August 15 2008 9:46pm Subject: bzr commit into mysql-5.0 branch (chad:2664) Bug#36270 List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/51773 X-Bug: 36270 Message-Id: <20080815194648.9878C83063@cornsilk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit #At file:///home/cmiller/work/mysqlbzr/mysql-5.0-bugteam/ 2664 Chad MILLER 2008-08-15 Bug#36270: incorrect calculation result - works in 4.1 but not in 5.0 or 5.1 When the fractional part in a multiplication of DECIMALs overflowed, we truncated the first operand rather than the longest. Now truncating least significant places instead for more precise multiplications. (Queuing at demand of Trudy/Davi.) modified: mysql-test/r/type_newdecimal.result mysql-test/t/type_newdecimal.test strings/decimal.c per-file messages: mysql-test/r/type_newdecimal.result show that if we need to truncate the scale of an operand, we pick the right one (that is, we discard the least significant decimal places) mysql-test/t/type_newdecimal.test show that if we need to truncate the scale of an operand, we pick the right one (that is, we discard the least significant decimal places) strings/decimal.c when needing to disregard fractional parts, pick the least significant ones === modified file 'mysql-test/r/type_newdecimal.result' --- a/mysql-test/r/type_newdecimal.result 2007-11-17 18:05:31 +0000 +++ b/mysql-test/r/type_newdecimal.result 2008-08-15 19:46:21 +0000 @@ -1519,4 +1519,9 @@ SELECT f1 FROM t1; f1 99999999999999999999999999999.999999999999999999999999999999 DROP TABLE t1; +select (1.20396873 * 0.89550000 * 0.68000000 * 1.08721696 * 0.99500000 * +1.01500000 * 1.01500000 * 0.99500000); +(1.20396873 * 0.89550000 * 0.68000000 * 1.08721696 * 0.99500000 * +1.01500000 * 1.01500000 * 0.99500000) +0.812988073953673124592306939480 End of 5.0 tests === modified file 'mysql-test/t/type_newdecimal.test' --- a/mysql-test/t/type_newdecimal.test 2007-11-17 18:05:31 +0000 +++ b/mysql-test/t/type_newdecimal.test 2008-08-15 19:46:21 +0000 @@ -1216,4 +1216,13 @@ DESC t1; SELECT f1 FROM t1; DROP TABLE t1; +# +# Bug #36270: incorrect calculation result - works in 4.1 but not in 5.0 or 5.1 +# + +# show that if we need to truncate the scale of an operand, we pick the +# right one (that is, we discard the least significant decimal places) +select (1.20396873 * 0.89550000 * 0.68000000 * 1.08721696 * 0.99500000 * + 1.01500000 * 1.01500000 * 0.99500000); + --echo End of 5.0 tests === modified file 'strings/decimal.c' --- a/strings/decimal.c 2008-01-14 15:16:36 +0000 +++ b/strings/decimal.c 2008-08-15 19:46:21 +0000 @@ -1999,18 +1999,18 @@ int decimal_mul(decimal_t *from1, decima sanity(to); - i=intg0; + i=intg0; /* save 'ideal' values */ j=frac0; - FIX_INTG_FRAC_ERROR(to->len, intg0, frac0, error); + FIX_INTG_FRAC_ERROR(to->len, intg0, frac0, error); /* bound size */ to->sign=from1->sign != from2->sign; - to->frac=from1->frac+from2->frac; + to->frac=from1->frac+from2->frac; /* store size in digits */ to->intg=intg0*DIG_PER_DEC1; if (unlikely(error)) { set_if_smaller(to->frac, frac0*DIG_PER_DEC1); set_if_smaller(to->intg, intg0*DIG_PER_DEC1); - if (unlikely(i > intg0)) + if (unlikely(i > intg0)) /* bounded integer-part */ { i-=intg0; j=i >> 1; @@ -2018,12 +2018,20 @@ int decimal_mul(decimal_t *from1, decima intg2-=i-j; frac1=frac2=0; /* frac0 is already 0 here */ } - else + else /* bounded fract part */ { j-=frac0; i=j >> 1; - frac1-= i; - frac2-=j-i; + if (frac1 <= frac2) + { + frac1-= i; + frac2-=j-i; + } + else + { + frac2-= i; + frac1-=j-i; + } } } start0=to->buf+intg0+frac0-1;